Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 19, 2017 [Issue 17408] scope and in are considered redundant | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17408 --- Comment #1 from anonymous4 <dfj1esp02@sneakemail.com> --- Maybe only @safe code should treat in as const? I think @system code should still treat it as const scope. -- |
July 13, 2019 [Issue 17408] scope and in are considered redundant | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17408 Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> --- @Geod24 created dlang/dmd pull request #10168 " Fix issue 17408: scope and in are considered redundant" fixing this issue: - Fix issue 17408: scope and in are considered redundant https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10168 -- |
November 18, 2022 [Issue 17408] scope and in are considered redundant | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17408 RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> --- Now that we have -preview=in should we close this? -- |
December 17, 2022 [Issue 17408] scope and in are considered redundant | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17408 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P1 |P3 -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation