According to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdQA0pGWa4

There are plan to add these keyword in C++'s module system.

On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 23:14:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> According to this:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdQA0pGWa4
>
> There are plan to add these keyword in C++'s module system.

Also, this module representation may be an opportunity for us to compile D to something a C++ compiler can digest (maybe ?).

On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 23:14:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> According to this:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdQA0pGWa4
>
> There are plan to add these keyword in C++'s module system.

I think I would prefer if C++ compilers started spitting out D bindings instead ;)

     Bit

On 25 November 2015 at 01:53, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 23:14:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>
>> According to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdQA0pGWa4
>>
>> There are plan to add these keyword in C++'s module system.
>>
>
> Also, this module representation may be an opportunity for us to compile D to something a C++ compiler can digest (maybe ?).
>
>
Not sure about Clang, but GCC already knows about modules from Fortran. The only difference I forsee is that the dwarf generator will be adapted to emit both modules and namespaces in the same CU - as opposed to just modules or just namespaces.

On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 08:27:22 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Not sure about Clang, but GCC already knows about modules from Fortran.

It's been quite a while already: http://clang.llvm.org/docs/Modules.html

On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 08:27:22 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 25 November 2015 at 01:53, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 23:14:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>
>>> According to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdQA0pGWa4
>>>
>>> There are plan to add these keyword in C++'s module system.
>>>
>>
>> Also, this module representation may be an opportunity for us to compile D to something a C++ compiler can digest (maybe ?).
>>
>>
> Not sure about Clang, but GCC already knows about modules from Fortran. The only difference I forsee is that the dwarf generator will be adapted to emit both modules and namespaces in the same CU - as opposed to just modules or just namespaces.

And templates...

On 25/11/2015 11:53 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 23:14:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> According to this:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdQA0pGWa4
>>
>> There are plan to add these keyword in C++'s module system.
>
> Also, this module representation may be an opportunity for us to compile
> D to something a C++ compiler can digest (maybe ?).
>

For what purpose?

On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 15:30:30 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> On 25/11/2015 11:53 AM, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 23:14:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> According to this:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdQA0pGWa4
>>>
>>> There are plan to add these keyword in C++'s module system.
>>
>> Also, this module representation may be an opportunity for us to compile
>> D to something a C++ compiler can digest (maybe ?).
>>
>
> For what purpose?

Compatibility with template-heavy c++ code.
other then that I can see no reason to do so.

I'd rather see the Opposite happen.