Yes, but the mmap allocator on Windows needs to be fixed.

Yes!

On 7/9/15 5:44 PM, Alex Parrill wrote:
> Yes, but the mmap allocator on Windows needs to be fixed.

What is the issue with it? I recall I pulled something recently. -- Andrei

On Friday, 10 July 2015 at 18:32:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 7/9/15 5:44 PM, Alex Parrill wrote:
>> Yes, but the mmap allocator on Windows needs to be fixed.
>
> What is the issue with it? I recall I pulled something recently. -- Andrei

It leaks. http://forum.dlang.org/post/itmcarskypkuospvfvbp@forum.dlang.org

On 7/10/15 4:29 PM, Alex Parrill wrote:
> On Friday, 10 July 2015 at 18:32:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 7/9/15 5:44 PM, Alex Parrill wrote:
>>> Yes, but the mmap allocator on Windows needs to be fixed.
>>
>> What is the issue with it? I recall I pulled something recently. --
>> Andrei
>
> It leaks. http://forum.dlang.org/post/itmcarskypkuospvfvbp@forum.dlang.org

I see. Could you or someone with Windows expertise create a PR for my branch? -- Andrei

On 11-Jul-2015 01:51, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 7/10/15 4:29 PM, Alex Parrill wrote:
>> On Friday, 10 July 2015 at 18:32:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 7/9/15 5:44 PM, Alex Parrill wrote:
>>>> Yes, but the mmap allocator on Windows needs to be fixed.
>>>
>>> What is the issue with it? I recall I pulled something recently. --
>>> Andrei
>>
>> It leaks.
>> http://forum.dlang.org/post/itmcarskypkuospvfvbp@forum.dlang.org
>
> I see. Could you or someone with Windows expertise create a PR for my
> branch? -- Andrei

This one? :)
https://github.com/andralex/phobos/pull/17

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:33:01 +0000
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:

> Andrei is back online and thus it is time to make a decision
> about adding his allocator package
> (http://forum.dlang.org/post/vfipmwojmvseqxoiwndr@forum.dlang.org) to Phobos
> std.experimental
> 
> Docs:
> http://erdani.com/d/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_allocator.html
> Code:
> https://github.com/andralex/phobos/tree/allocator/std/experimental/allocator
> 
> Please respond to this post with a comment starting with a single "Yes"/"No" and optional explanation after that. Criteria you are expected to evaluate as part of "Yes":
> 
> - is this functionality needed in Phobos
> - is basic design sound (some breaking changes are OK for
> std.experimental but not full redesign)
> 
> As usual, anyone can vote, but opinions of Phobos developers hold more value.
> 
> Voting ends in 2 weeks, on July 22.

Yes

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Voting ends in 2 weeks, on July 22.

~1 week remains

On Thursday, 16 July 2015 at 10:02:17 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Voting ends in 2 weeks, on July 22.
>
> ~1 week remains

Yes. It's time to have this functionality in standart library.

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Voting ends in 2 weeks, on July 22.

Voting ends tomorrow. At this point it is almost impossible to fail so it is up to Phobos team how to proceed with the PR.