https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14360

ag0aep6g@gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ag0aep6g@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from ag0aep6g@gmail.com ---
As in issue 14353, dmd needs the ampersand: `return &bar;`. Without it, it's treated as a parentheses-less call.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14360

--- Comment #2 from Shammah Chancellor <shammah.chancellor@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to ag0aep6g from comment #1)
> As in issue 14353, dmd needs the ampersand: `return &bar;`. Without it, it's treated as a parentheses-less call.


Has the spec changed with regards to this?  There is not "Symbol.Function" going on in this test.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14360

--- Comment #3 from ag0aep6g@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Shammah Chancellor from comment #2)
> Has the spec changed with regards to this?

I don't know if the spec maybe changed at some point. Could be that a naked function/method symbol without parentheses was treated as a function pointer / delegate in the distant past. I think they've been calls for at least a couple of years, though.

> There is not "Symbol.Function" going on in this test.

It doesn't matter if it's "Symbol.Function" or just "Function".

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14360

Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to ag0aep6g from comment #3)
> (In reply to Shammah Chancellor from comment #2)
> > Has the spec changed with regards to this?
> 
> I don't know if the spec maybe changed at some point. Could be that a naked function/method symbol without parentheses was treated as a function pointer / delegate in the distant past. I think they've been calls for at least a couple of years, though.

As far as I know (at least from before the D1.000 release), D has always required address operator to take function pointer / delegate from a function identifier.

It's definitely a bug in SDC.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14360

Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@erdani.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|unspecified                 |D2

--