https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10850

Stewart Gordon <smjg@iname.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |spec
                 CC|                            |smjg@iname.com

--- Comment #12 from Stewart Gordon <smjg@iname.com> ---
The spec doesn't comment one way or the other.  There was a discussion once upon a time about it, but I don't remember it coming to any conclusion.  I'll try and dig it up when I get the chance.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10850

--- Comment #13 from Sobirari Muhomori <dfj1esp02@sneakemail.com> ---
A good reason for binding: http://forum.dlang.org/post/lv441t$23qa$1@digitalmars.com

(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #10)
> Related: issue 10758

Does it have a test for voldemort types returned from a function?

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10850

--- Comment #14 from Sobirari Muhomori <dfj1esp02@sneakemail.com> ---
Another complication of binding is that `inout` is going to be allowed in fields of nested types, while normally it's disallowed.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10850

--- Comment #15 from Stewart Gordon <smjg@iname.com> ---
(In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #13)
> Does it have a test for voldemort types returned from a function?

What's a voldemort type?

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10850

--- Comment #16 from Sobirari Muhomori <dfj1esp02@sneakemail.com> ---
Struct nested in a function. Called so because it can't be named outside function.

--