Second beta for the 2.068.0 release.

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2.x/2.068.0/ http://ftp.digitalmars.com/

Also available on Travis-CI as dmd-2.068.0-b2.

The changelog (http://dlang.org/changelog.html#2.068.0) contains a list
of all fixed issues that will be included in 2.068.0.
A description of library and language changes is still upcoming.

This beta comes with 27 dmd, 2 druntime, and 4 phobos fixes.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/compare/v2.068.0-b1...v2.068.0-b2 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/compare/v2.068.0-b1...v2.068.0-b2 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/compare/v2.068.0-b1...v2.068.0-b2

Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org.

-Martin

On 07/25/2015 02:20 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Second beta for the 2.068.0 release.
> 
> http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2.x/2.068.0/ http://ftp.digitalmars.com/

BTW, I'd like to phase out the fat 50-60MB combined zip, and add
tar.xz/gz for linux/freebsd/osx.
Does anyone still rely on the combined zip?

On 26/07/2015 12:20 a.m., Martin Nowak wrote:
> Second beta for the 2.068.0 release.
>
> http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2.x/2.068.0/
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/
>
> Also available on Travis-CI as dmd-2.068.0-b2.
>
> The changelog (http://dlang.org/changelog.html#2.068.0) contains a list
> of all fixed issues that will be included in 2.068.0.
> A description of library and language changes is still upcoming.
>
> This beta comes with 27 dmd, 2 druntime, and 4 phobos fixes.
>
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/compare/v2.068.0-b1...v2.068.0-b2
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/compare/v2.068.0-b1...v2.068.0-b2
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/compare/v2.068.0-b1...v2.068.0-b2
>
> Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org.
>
> -Martin
>

*Grumbles* I was hoping a bug I found was fixed in ~master. It's not.
I'll submit bug report later but:

Internal error: backend\cgcv.c 217

But only in -debug -m64 without -v on Windows. With -v or -release, it builds fine.

On 07/26/2015 09:55 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 07/25/2015 02:20 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> Second beta for the 2.068.0 release.
>>
>> http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2.x/2.068.0/
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/
>
> BTW, I'd like to phase out the fat 50-60MB combined zip, and add
> tar.xz/gz for linux/freebsd/osx.
> Does anyone still rely on the combined zip?
>

I think DVM still relies on it (unless I just have an old DVM on this machine)

The first RC of vibe.d 0.7.24 has also just been released. It works with DMD 2.068.0-b2. The final release will happen in lock-step with the DMD release.

Changelog:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md

On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Second beta for the 2.068.0 release.

Is std.expermimental.allocator planned for 2.068 ?
I see it's still not merged and we already almost in August.

On Sunday, 26 July 2015 at 21:13:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> Second beta for the 2.068.0 release.
>
> Is std.expermimental.allocator planned for 2.068 ?
> I see it's still not merged and we already almost in August.

yeah was hoping to see it in there too

--Stephan

On Sunday, 26 July 2015 at 21:13:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> Second beta for the 2.068.0 release.
>
> Is std.expermimental.allocator planned for 2.068 ?
> I see it's still not merged and we already almost in August.

That makes me disappointed. I spent many hours reviewing and debugging that package. I have several projects that depend on it and I'd rather not maintain my own copy any more.

On Sunday, 26 July 2015 at 23:07:15 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 July 2015 at 21:13:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
>> On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>>> Second beta for the 2.068.0 release.
>>
>> Is std.expermimental.allocator planned for 2.068 ?
>> I see it's still not merged and we already almost in August.
>
> That makes me disappointed. I spent many hours reviewing and debugging that package. I have several projects that depend on it and I'd rather not maintain my own copy any more.

Please merge allocators. How did the review finish, BTW? Still waiting on its summary. Unless I missed it.

Thanks for the work on getting this included in 2.068.

Joseph

On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 03:18:13 UTC, Joseph Cassman wrote:
> [...]
> How did the review finish, BTW? Still waiting on its summary. Unless I missed it.
>

Looks like the review summary was just posted. Thanks for the update.

Joseph