Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 12, 2018 Possible dmd 2.078 regression ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before. Please test this --- if [ ! -d "iz" ]; then git clone https://www.github.com/BBasile/iz.git fi cd iz/scripts sh compile.sh cd ../ #fails to link dmd samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d lib/iz.a -Iimport > ddemangle #on the other hand, this works... dub samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d <<< "q" #or even this... dmd samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d import/iz/strings.d import/iz/memory.d -Iimport --- and tell me what do you think: regression or not ? |
January 12, 2018 Re: Possible dmd 2.078 regression ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Basile B. | On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before. Please test this
>
> ---
> if [ ! -d "iz" ]; then
> git clone https://www.github.com/BBasile/iz.git
> fi
>
> cd iz/scripts
> sh compile.sh
> cd ../
>
> #fails to link
> dmd samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d lib/iz.a -Iimport > ddemangle
>
>
> #on the other hand, this works...
> dub samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d <<< "q"
>
> #or even this...
> dmd samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d import/iz/strings.d import/iz/memory.d -Iimport
> ---
>
> and tell me what do you think: regression or not ?
I guess a mangle problem ?
|
January 12, 2018 Re: Possible dmd 2.078 regression ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stefan Koch | On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before.
> I guess a mangle problem ?
Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
i'm digging right now.
|
January 12, 2018 Re: Possible dmd 2.078 regression ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Basile B. | On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote: > On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote: >>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before. >> I guess a mangle problem ? > > Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression. > i'm digging right now. digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is untestable. digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect. digger: The first bad commit could be any of: digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1 digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69 object.Exception@bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more! |
January 26, 2018 Re: Possible dmd 2.078 regression ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Basile B. | On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before.
>>> I guess a mangle problem ?
>>
>> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
>> i'm digging right now.
>
> digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is untestable.
> digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect.
> digger: The first bad commit could be any of:
> digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec
> digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1
> digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69
> object.Exception@bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more!
please file a bug on d.puremagic.com/issues/
|
January 26, 2018 Re: Possible dmd 2.078 regression ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to timotheecour | On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 21:52:30 UTC, timotheecour wrote: > On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote: >> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote: >>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote: >>>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before. >>>> I guess a mangle problem ? >>> >>> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression. >>> i'm digging right now. >> >> digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is untestable. >> digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect. >> digger: The first bad commit could be any of: >> digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec >> digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1 >> digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69 >> object.Exception@bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more! > > please file a bug on d.puremagic.com/issues/ Yeah i did. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18234 I saw a related (but not similar) thing yesterday. the guy has to pass a dummy.d file for linking to succeed. |
January 26, 2018 Re: Possible dmd 2.078 regression ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Basile B. | On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 22:15:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote: > On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 21:52:30 UTC, timotheecour wrote: >> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote: >>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote: >>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >>>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote: >>>>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before. >>>>> I guess a mangle problem ? >>>> >>>> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression. >>>> i'm digging right now. >>> >>> digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is untestable. >>> digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect. >>> digger: The first bad commit could be any of: >>> digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec >>> digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1 >>> digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69 >>> object.Exception@bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more! >> >> please file a bug on d.puremagic.com/issues/ > > Yeah i did. > > https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18234 > > I saw a related (but not similar) thing yesterday. the guy has to pass a dummy.d file for linking to succeed. Ah it was you actually: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.2616.1516919399.9493.digitalmars-d-bugs@puremagic.com |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation