Using gdb `print` instead of enum value I see `incomplete type`. Did I miss something? (I use gdb 7.10 from ttp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/)

Thanks

Am Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:45:58 +0300
schrieb drug <drug2004@bk.ru>:

> Using gdb `print` instead of enum value I see `incomplete type`. Did I miss something? (I use gdb 7.10 from ttp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/)
> 
> Thanks

Which gdc branch/version? And please provide a testcase as I can't reproduce this bug with a simple example:

Breakpoint 1, D main () at test.d:11
11	    TestEnum e;
(gdb) print e
$1 = a

On 21 October 2015 at 10:45, drug via D.gnu <d.gnu@puremagic.com> wrote:

> Using gdb `print` instead of enum value I see `incomplete type`. Did I miss something? (I use gdb 7.10 from ttp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/)
>
> Thanks
>


Depends what you mean by 'enum'.  Only integral types are treated as enum in the C sense.  All other value types (bool, float) are treated as constant literals that you can only access through it's qualified name. Don't expect aggregate types (struct, array, associative array) to show properly either.

21.10.2015 18:22, Johannes Pfau пишет:
> Am Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:45:58 +0300
> schrieb drug <drug2004@bk.ru>:
>
>> Using gdb `print` instead of enum value I see `incomplete type`. Did
>> I miss something? (I use gdb 7.10 from ttp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/)
>>
>> Thanks
>
> Which gdc branch/version? And please provide a testcase as I can't
Oh, sorry, I use dmd-built binaries, so this is the reason, I guess? Does gdb work as expected only with gdc-built binaries?
> reproduce this bug with a simple example:
>
> Breakpoint 1, D main () at test.d:11
> 11	    TestEnum e;
> (gdb) print e
> $1 = a
>

21.10.2015 19:31, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu пишет:
> On 21 October 2015 at 10:45, drug via D.gnu <d.gnu@puremagic.com
> <mailto:d.gnu@puremagic.com>> wrote:
>
>     Using gdb `print` instead of enum value I see `incomplete type`. Did
>     I miss something? (I use gdb 7.10 from ttp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/
>     <http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/>)
>
>     Thanks
>
>
>
> Depends what you mean by 'enum'.  Only integral types are treated as
> enum in the C sense.  All other value types (bool, float) are treated as
> constant literals that you can only access through it's qualified name.
> Don't expect aggregate types (struct, array, associative array) to show
> properly either.
As I said above, I use dmd-build binaries and I should say that gdb works very well with structs for me. The only exception so far is enum.

On 21 October 2015 at 19:52, drug via D.gnu <d.gnu@puremagic.com> wrote:

> 21.10.2015 19:31, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu пишет:
>
>> On 21 October 2015 at 10:45, drug via D.gnu <d.gnu@puremagic.com <mailto:d.gnu@puremagic.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Using gdb `print` instead of enum value I see `incomplete type`. Did
>>     I miss something? (I use gdb 7.10 from ttp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/
>>     <http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/>)
>>
>>     Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Depends what you mean by 'enum'.  Only integral types are treated as enum in the C sense.  All other value types (bool, float) are treated as constant literals that you can only access through it's qualified name. Don't expect aggregate types (struct, array, associative array) to show properly either.
>>
> As I said above, I use dmd-build binaries and I should say that gdb works very well with structs for me. The only exception so far is enum.
>

I meant enum : MyStruct { ... }

I guess DMD does not support emitting enums to debug then.

21.10.2015 21:04, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu пишет:
>
>
> I meant enum : MyStruct { ... }
>
> I guess DMD does not support emitting enums to debug then.
>
I see. Thanks!