On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 15:23:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2015-03-27 16:04, Dicebot wrote:
>
>> not at all. The fact it is reserved is already denoted by __, otherwise
>> it is just another vairable/symbol.
>
> Doesn't this symbol also have special semantics?

Not really. It has special value (true within ctfe, false in normal code generation) but otherwise it is just a normal variable.

On 2015-03-28 01:01, Jesse Phillips wrote:

> Statement [e.g. debug, return, function, with] (that needs fixed)

Not sure what you mean.

> Probably should be Identifier for consistency [e.g. _arugments, __vptr,
> _ctor]

I completely forgot about these. Should these be the same as __ctfe?

> Which I guess is your third (special recognized built-in), though
> __LINE__ is a constant in Vim's highlighting [e.g. null, __VERSION__].

Yeah, both null and __LINE__ are constants in TextMate as well. I probably didn't use the correct name for describing it.

>> * __traits identifiers
>>
>> __traits(allMembers, Foo);
>>
>> In this case "allMembers". Basically the same question and
>> alternatives as for the "__ctfe" variable.
>
> Identifier

Same as __LINE__ or?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 00:01:48 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> Probably should be Identifier for consistency [e.g. _arugments, __vptr, _ctor]

Isn't __ctor just a DMD thing? I don't think we should be highlighting symbols which aren't guaranteed to even exist for a particular implementation.

On 2015-03-27 11:34, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> I'm currently updating the TextMate D bundle for D2. I have a couple of
> questions for how to highlighting some specific code or how other
> editors/IDE's highlight them.

What about #line?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg