Menu
Search

Forums

Forum Index

Thread overview
Formal review of DIP1001
Nov 17, 2016
Dicebot
November 17, 2016
Gravatar of DicebotPosted by DicebotReply
Dicebot
Gravatar of Dicebot
Attachments:


Reply
Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness.

Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review
November 17, 2016
Gravatar of Andrei AlexandrescuPosted by Andrei Alexandrescu
in reply to Dicebot		Reply
Andrei Alexandrescu
Gravatar of Andrei Alexandrescu
Posted in reply to Dicebot


Reply
On 11/17/2016 06:35 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would
> need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness.
>
> Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale:
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review

"does nor argue" -> "does not argue" -- Andrei
November 17, 2016
Gravatar of Andrei AlexandrescuPosted by Andrei Alexandrescu
in reply to Dicebot		Reply
Andrei Alexandrescu
Gravatar of Andrei Alexandrescu
Posted in reply to Dicebot


Reply
On 11/17/2016 06:35 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would
> need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness.
>
> Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale:
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review

"to be include" -> "to include" (my bad, also propagated by copypasta in both responses). -- Andrei