Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 03, 2017 Typo on the grammar section of the spec | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
(PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly applied in the language? |
February 03, 2017 Re: Typo on the grammar section of the spec | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to FatalCatharsis | On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
> (PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly applied in the language?
Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule
|
February 02, 2017 Re: Typo on the grammar section of the spec | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to FatalCatharsis | On 02/02/2017 07:46 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote:
> On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
>> (PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the
>> line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent
>> many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can
>> someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly
>> applied in the language?
>
> Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule
Yes, definitely looks like a documentation bug. In all other places, there is always another symbol on the right hand side.
Ali
|
February 03, 2017 Re: Typo on the grammar section of the spec | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ali Çehreli | On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 05:38:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 07:46 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote:
>> On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
>>> (PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the
>>> line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent
>>> many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can
>>> someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly
>>> applied in the language?
>>
>> Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule
>
> Yes, definitely looks like a documentation bug. In all other places, there is always another symbol on the right hand side.
>
> Ali
Cool, is there some place to make an issue for it? Don't want any unsuspecting goobers like me falling for it :P.
|
February 03, 2017 Re: Typo on the grammar section of the spec | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to FatalCatharsis | On 02/02/2017 10:07 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote: > Cool, is there some place to make an issue for it? Try the two links at the top of each page: "Report a bug" and "Improve this page" > Don't want any unsuspecting goobers like me falling for it :P. People who read those pages down to every colon deserve to suffer. :o) (Actually, I think you implied that one of your tools is parsing that page.) Ali |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation