Thread overview
Typo on the grammar section of the spec
Feb 03, 2017
FatalCatharsis
Feb 03, 2017
FatalCatharsis
Feb 03, 2017
Ali Çehreli
Feb 03, 2017
FatalCatharsis
Feb 03, 2017
Ali Çehreli
February 03, 2017
(PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly applied in the language?
February 03, 2017
On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
> (PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly applied in the language?

Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule
February 02, 2017
On 02/02/2017 07:46 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote:
> On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
>> (PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the
>> line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent
>> many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can
>> someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly
>> applied in the language?
>
> Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule

Yes, definitely looks like a documentation bug. In all other places, there is always another symbol on the right hand side.

Ali

February 03, 2017
On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 05:38:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 07:46 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote:
>> On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
>>> (PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the
>>> line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent
>>> many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can
>>> someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly
>>> applied in the language?
>>
>> Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule
>
> Yes, definitely looks like a documentation bug. In all other places, there is always another symbol on the right hand side.
>
> Ali

Cool, is there some place to make an issue for it? Don't want any unsuspecting goobers like me falling for it :P.
February 03, 2017
On 02/02/2017 10:07 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote:

> Cool, is there some place to make an issue for it?

Try the two links at the top of each page: "Report a bug" and "Improve this page"

> Don't want any unsuspecting goobers like me falling for it :P.

People who read those pages down to every colon deserve to suffer. :o) (Actually, I think you implied that one of your tools is parsing that page.)

Ali