We just put together a page that counts the bugs per category. It's linked from "Bug tracker" in the navigation panel.

http://dlang.org/bugstats.php

The format is sketchy. Looking forward to your suggestions for improvements.


Andrei

On Sunday, January 22, 2012 01:18:04 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> We just put together a page that counts the bugs per category. It's linked from "Bug tracker" in the navigation panel.
> 
> http://dlang.org/bugstats.php
> 
> The format is sketchy. Looking forward to your suggestions for improvements.

Looks pretty good, though it does take a while to fully load. I'd advise removing the decimal points from the bug counts. You can't have partial bugs, and with 3 decimal places, it starts looking like the European version of the thousands separator.

- Jonathan M Davis

On 1/21/2012 11:18 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> We just put together a page that counts the bugs per category. It's linked from "Bug tracker" in the navigation panel.
> 
> http://dlang.org/bugstats.php
> 
> The format is sketchy. Looking forward to your suggestions for improvements.
> 
> 
> Andrei

Please see my comments on that commit.  The way you've implemented it about the most expensive way possible for both my server and the dlang.org server.

The bugzilla links up the top don't work for me.

Are you inculding dups in the resolved count?

"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote in message news:jfgd7b$1a8j$1@digitalmars.com...
> We just put together a page that counts the bugs per category. It's linked from "Bug tracker" in the navigation panel.
>
> http://dlang.org/bugstats.php
>

Nice! And just look at that purple line skyrocket!

Also nice to see that the distance between new and resolved is increasing.

> The format is sketchy. Looking forward to your suggestions for improvements.
>

A good, but perhaps obvious, start would be eliminating those ~10 lines of blank wasted space from each category ;)

On 1/22/12 1:55 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> The bugzilla links up the top don't work for me.

Do they work now?

> Are you inculding dups in the resolved count?

Everything with the status RESOLVED, so I think so.


Andrei

It might be worth separating bugs that have the Version field set to lower than 2.000, so we know which bugs are D2-only.

On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:18:04 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:

> We just put together a page that counts the bugs per category. It's linked from "Bug tracker" in the navigation panel.
>
> http://dlang.org/bugstats.php
>
> The format is sketchy. Looking forward to your suggestions for improvements.

Interesting, indeed. My comments:


The dates on the chart look completely random. Perhaps a tick for
each month, and text only for each year?

5000.000 is a silly number of bugs, just like 3.1415926535897932
is a silly number of bugs. Get rid of the decimals.

The scope should be limited to those not marked Duplicate or Invalid,
methinks. Perhaps also Wontfix.

While some trends can be seen, it would be interesting to see
resolved / new.

I expected the links to show a graph for that category, not to list
the bugs in that category.

While Assigned and Reopened are negligible compared to New, I feel
the chart would be more informational by showing Resolved vs
Unresolved. The sudden drops in New around September '09 and
January '11 seem like a good thing, but it's really only a change
of status to Assigned, not to Resolved.


Last, this was a fun chart to see, and will likely be more fun the
future.

On 1/22/12 3:37 PM, Simen Kjærås wrote:
> The dates on the chart look completely random. Perhaps a tick for
> each month, and text only for each year?
>
> 5000.000 is a silly number of bugs, just like 3.1415926535897932
> is a silly number of bugs. Get rid of the decimals.
>
> The scope should be limited to those not marked Duplicate or Invalid,
> methinks. Perhaps also Wontfix.
>
> While some trends can be seen, it would be interesting to see
> resolved / new.
>
> I expected the links to show a graph for that category, not to list
> the bugs in that category.
>
> While Assigned and Reopened are negligible compared to New, I feel
> the chart would be more informational by showing Resolved vs
> Unresolved. The sudden drops in New around September '09 and
> January '11 seem like a good thing, but it's really only a change
> of status to Assigned, not to Resolved.

Thanks for these thoughts. I should add that I need to defer most of them to others because I have little knowledge of whether and how bugzilla can be controlled.

Andrei

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> We just put together a page that counts the bugs per category. It's
> linked from "Bug tracker" in the navigation panel.
>
> http://dlang.org/bugstats.php
>
> The format is sketchy. Looking forward to your suggestions for
> improvements.
>
>
> Andrei

In FF there are blank spaces between rows due to iframe's default height.

Please change DISPLAY macro to the following:

DISPLAY=$(TR $(TD <font color=$3>$(LINK2 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?$2, $1)</font>) $(TD <iframe scrolling=no frameborder=0 width="4.8em" height="1.4em" style="width:4.8em;height:1.4em;" vspace="0" hspace="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" src=fetch-issue-cnt.php?$2&format=table&action=wrap&ctype=csv></iframe>))