Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
Closed development with Trello?
Apr 20, 2012
simendsjo
Apr 20, 2012
Jens Mueller
Apr 20, 2012
Don Clugston
Apr 20, 2012
simendsjo
Apr 20, 2012
Jacob Carlborg
Apr 20, 2012
simendsjo
Apr 20, 2012
Brad Anderson
Apr 20, 2012
Brad Anderson
Apr 20, 2012
simendsjo
Apr 24, 2012
Jonas Drewsen
April 20, 2012
D has been following a very open development process.
There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?) have been moved to Trello.
It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.

Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?
April 20, 2012
simendsjo wrote:
> D has been following a very open development process.
> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?)
> have been moved to Trello.
> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even
> search for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong
> direction.
> 
> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?

It seems the boards can be made public (see Public Boards). https://trello.com/#board/trello-development/4d5ea62fd76aa1136000000c

Jens
April 20, 2012
On 20/04/12 11:11, simendsjo wrote:
> D has been following a very open development process.
> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?)
> have been moved to Trello.
> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search
> for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.
>
> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?

Nothing is happening on Trello AFAIK.
April 20, 2012
On 20-04-2012 11:11, simendsjo wrote:
> D has been following a very open development process.
> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?)
> have been moved to Trello.
> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search
> for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.
>
> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?

The intention was to actually open the boards now, AFAIK.

Andrei?

-- 
- Alex
April 20, 2012
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:11:14 -0400, simendsjo <simendsjo@gmail.com> wrote:

> D has been following a very open development process.
> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?) have been moved to Trello.

Don't kid yourself, people have yet AFAIK to use trello very much.  Which is kind of disappointing, it's a nice tool.

> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.
>
> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?

I think it can be made open for viewing even if it's not open for changing.  You'd have to consult Andrei, as he owns all the boards.

-Steve
April 20, 2012
On 4/20/12 4:45 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 20-04-2012 11:11, simendsjo wrote:
>> D has been following a very open development process.
>> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
>> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?)
>> have been moved to Trello.
>> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search
>> for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.
>>
>> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?
>
> The intention was to actually open the boards now, AFAIK.
>
> Andrei?

Opened all boards I own for viewing, voting, and commenting. Note that I don't own the Phobos review queue board so I could not edit it.

Andrei


April 20, 2012
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:41:20 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:

> On 4/20/12 4:45 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>> On 20-04-2012 11:11, simendsjo wrote:
>>> D has been following a very open development process.
>>> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
>>> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?)
>>> have been moved to Trello.
>>> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search
>>> for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?
>>
>> The intention was to actually open the boards now, AFAIK.
>>
>> Andrei?
>
> Opened all boards I own for viewing, voting, and commenting. Note that I don't own the Phobos review queue board so I could not edit it.
>
> Andrei
>
>

Thanks. Still need a link as there isn't a search function at trello.com
April 20, 2012
On 2012-04-20 15:41, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> Opened all boards I own for viewing, voting, and commenting. Note that I
> don't own the Phobos review queue board so I could not edit it.

Would you like to share the link(s) as well?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg
April 20, 2012
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:41:20 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:

> On 4/20/12 4:45 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>> On 20-04-2012 11:11, simendsjo wrote:
>>> D has been following a very open development process.
>>> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
>>> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?)
>>> have been moved to Trello.
>>> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search
>>> for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?
>>
>> The intention was to actually open the boards now, AFAIK.
>>
>> Andrei?
>
> Opened all boards I own for viewing, voting, and commenting. Note that I don't own the Phobos review queue board so I could not edit it.

Hm... I created the board, but I added you as an admin.  I see you did actually open it up, so it should be open for people to look at.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:50:23 -0400, simendsjo <simendsjo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks. Still need a link as there isn't a search function at trello.com

huh?  I see a search box up top?  I didn't even know you could do a link...

try searching for dlang

-Steve
April 20, 2012
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:31:59 +0200, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:41:20 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:
>
>> On 4/20/12 4:45 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>>> On 20-04-2012 11:11, simendsjo wrote:
>>>> D has been following a very open development process.
>>>> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
>>>> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?)
>>>> have been moved to Trello.
>>>> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search
>>>> for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?
>>>
>>> The intention was to actually open the boards now, AFAIK.
>>>
>>> Andrei?
>>
>> Opened all boards I own for viewing, voting, and commenting. Note that I don't own the Phobos review queue board so I could not edit it.
>
> Hm... I created the board, but I added you as an admin.  I see you did actually open it up, so it should be open for people to look at.
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:50:23 -0400, simendsjo <simendsjo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Still need a link as there isn't a search function at trello.com
>
> huh?  I see a search box up top?  I didn't even know you could do a link...
>
> try searching for dlang
>
> -Steve

"No results". It seems to only search for boards you are involved in. No global search.
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2