July 14, 2012 Re: Making uniform function call syntax more complete a feature | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Christophe Travert | On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:31:34 +0200, Christophe Travert <travert@phare.normalesup.org> wrote:
> By the way, would it be possible to implement an opCmp that returns a
> double, to allow it to return a NaN ? That may allow to create values
> that are neither superior, nor inferior to other value, like NaNs. It's
> not possible to implement opCmp for a floating point comparison if opCmp
> is bound to return an int.
Why don't you just test it? Not like it'd be many lines of code.
Anyways, yes this works.
--
Simen
|
July 16, 2012 Re: Making uniform function call syntax more complete a feature | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Simen Kjaeraas | "Simen Kjaeraas" , dans le message (digitalmars.D:172349), a écrit :
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:31:34 +0200, Christophe Travert <travert@phare.normalesup.org> wrote:
>
>> By the way, would it be possible to implement an opCmp that returns a double, to allow it to return a NaN ? That may allow to create values that are neither superior, nor inferior to other value, like NaNs. It's not possible to implement opCmp for a floating point comparison if opCmp is bound to return an int.
>
> Why don't you just test it? Not like it'd be many lines of code.
>
> Anyways, yes this works.
Thanks. I don't always have a d compiler at hand when I read this newsgroup. Maybe I should just write myself a todo to make this kind of test back home rather than directly posting the idea.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation