July 14, 2012
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:31:34 +0200, Christophe Travert <travert@phare.normalesup.org> wrote:

> By the way, would it be possible to implement an opCmp that returns a
> double, to allow it to return a NaN ? That may allow to create values
> that are neither superior, nor inferior to other value, like NaNs. It's
> not possible to implement opCmp for a floating point comparison if opCmp
> is bound to return an int.

Why don't you just test it? Not like it'd be many lines of code.

Anyways, yes this works.

--
Simen
July 16, 2012
"Simen Kjaeraas" , dans le message (digitalmars.D:172349), a écrit :
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:31:34 +0200, Christophe Travert <travert@phare.normalesup.org> wrote:
> 
>> By the way, would it be possible to implement an opCmp that returns a double, to allow it to return a NaN ? That may allow to create values that are neither superior, nor inferior to other value, like NaNs. It's not possible to implement opCmp for a floating point comparison if opCmp is bound to return an int.
> 
> Why don't you just test it? Not like it'd be many lines of code.
> 
> Anyways, yes this works.

Thanks. I don't always have a d compiler at hand when I read this newsgroup. Maybe I should just write myself a todo to make this kind of test back home rather than directly posting the idea.
1 2
Next ›   Last »