What means this:
"kind UseEventFreeList declaration must be at module level"

from DMD?

Seems to have been introduced since 0.98- I just upgraded from that.

TIA
John

A recent compiler change forces all "version" statements to be at the
top level of a module (as the error states). The word "kind" in the
error is a bit confusing but the general thrust of the error is
understandable. My guess is the code you're compiling has
 version = UseEventFreeList
in it somewhere that isn't on the top level.

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:04:40 -0400, teqDruid <me@teqdruid.com> wrote:

>What means this:
>"kind UseEventFreeList declaration must be at module level"
>
>from DMD?
>
>Seems to have been introduced since 0.98- I just upgraded from that.
>
>TIA
>John

Actually, I'm not using versioning at all, so that's not it.

John

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:30:58 -0400, Ben Hinkle wrote:

> A recent compiler change forces all "version" statements to be at the
> top level of a module (as the error states). The word "kind" in the
> error is a bit confusing but the general thrust of the error is
> understandable. My guess is the code you're compiling has
>  version = UseEventFreeList
> in it somewhere that isn't on the top level.
> 
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:04:40 -0400, teqDruid <me@teqdruid.com> wrote:
> 
>>What means this:
>>"kind UseEventFreeList declaration must be at module level"
>>
>>from DMD?
>>
>>Seems to have been introduced since 0.98- I just upgraded from that.
>>
>>TIA
>>John

teqDruid wrote:
> Actually, I'm not using versioning at all, so that's not it.

That's weird.

I just did a search in the \dmd\src\dmd directory for the phrase "module level" and it only seems to show up in "version.c".

I can't find a mention of "UseEventFreeList" anywhere in \dmd\src.

Could you be using debug? Or maybe it indicates a problem with a version declaration in Phobos.

> John
> 
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:30:58 -0400, Ben Hinkle wrote:
> 
> 
>>A recent compiler change forces all "version" statements to be at the
>>top level of a module (as the error states). The word "kind" in the
>>error is a bit confusing but the general thrust of the error is
>>understandable. My guess is the code you're compiling has 
>> version = UseEventFreeList 
>>in it somewhere that isn't on the top level.
>>
>>On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:04:40 -0400, teqDruid <me@teqdruid.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What means this:
>>>"kind UseEventFreeList declaration must be at module level"
>>>
>>
>>>from DMD?
>>
>>>Seems to have been introduced since 0.98- I just upgraded from that.
>>>
>>>TIA
>>>John

-- 
Justin (a/k/a jcc7)
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

Found the offender... it was in an old copy of Mango that was for some odd reason in my source path.

Thanks guys
John

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:46:15 -0500, J C Calvarese wrote:

> teqDruid wrote:
>> Actually, I'm not using versioning at all, so that's not it.
> 
> That's weird.
> 
> I just did a search in the \dmd\src\dmd directory for the phrase "module level" and it only seems to show up in "version.c".
> 
> I can't find a mention of "UseEventFreeList" anywhere in \dmd\src.
> 
> Could you be using debug? Or maybe it indicates a problem with a version declaration in Phobos.
> 
>> John
>> 
>> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:30:58 -0400, Ben Hinkle wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>A recent compiler change forces all "version" statements to be at the top level of a module (as the error states). The word "kind" in the error is a bit confusing but the general thrust of the error is understandable. My guess is the code you're compiling has
>>> version = UseEventFreeList
>>>in it somewhere that isn't on the top level.
>>>
>>>On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:04:40 -0400, teqDruid <me@teqdruid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>What means this:
>>>>"kind UseEventFreeList declaration must be at module level"
>>>>
>>>
>>>>from DMD?
>>>
>>>>Seems to have been introduced since 0.98- I just upgraded from that.
>>>>
>>>>TIA
>>>>John