My students and I are making a pass through a bunch of bugzilla issues closing the ones that ought to be closed and marking the simple ones with the "trivial" bug.

https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&component=dlang.org&component=dmd&component=druntime&component=installer&component=phobos&component=tools&component=visuald&keywords=trivial%2C%20&keywords_type=allwords&list_id=212553&product=D&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&version=D2

The list is likely to grow so refresh often. If you have some down time this time of the year, you may want to take a look at fixing some of them. Happy Holidays!


Thanks,

Andrei

On Friday, 23 December 2016 at 19:50:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> My students and I are making a pass through a bunch of bugzilla issues closing the ones that ought to be closed and marking the simple ones with the "trivial" bug.
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&component=dlang.org&component=dmd&component=druntime&component=installer&component=phobos&component=tools&component=visuald&keywords=trivial%2C%20&keywords_type=allwords&list_id=212553&product=D&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&version=D2
>
> The list is likely to grow so refresh often. If you have some down time this time of the year, you may want to take a look at fixing some of them. Happy Holidays!
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei

Is this still accurate? I mean if I change some issue to "trivial", is there any process which will notify you or your students about it? Or are they actively watch this list?

On 02/09/2017 05:03 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> Is this still accurate? I mean if I change some issue to "trivial", is
> there any process which will notify you or your students about it? Or
> are they actively watch this list?

There is no automation. Thanks! -- Andrei

On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 02:42:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 02/09/2017 05:03 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>> Is this still accurate? I mean if I change some issue to "trivial", is
>> there any process which will notify you or your students about it? Or
>> are they actively watch this list?
>
> There is no automation. Thanks! -- Andrei

Speaking of the recent discussion of abandoned trivial PRs, here's
the one I submitted PR for, but got 0 attention:

https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1675

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16470

On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 14:36:31 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
> On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 02:42:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 02/09/2017 05:03 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>> Is this still accurate? I mean if I change some issue to "trivial", is
>>> there any process which will notify you or your students about it? Or
>>> are they actively watch this list?
>>
>> There is no automation. Thanks! -- Andrei
>
> Speaking of the recent discussion of abandoned trivial PRs, here's
> the one I submitted PR for, but got 0 attention:
>
> https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1675
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16470

Hmm. For me seems like you got some comments on your PR but didn't answer. Seems plausible not to include such PR.

On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 17:15:12 UTC, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote:
> On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 14:36:31 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
>> On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 02:42:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 02/09/2017 05:03 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>>> Is this still accurate? I mean if I change some issue to "trivial", is
>>>> there any process which will notify you or your students about it? Or
>>>> are they actively watch this list?
>>>
>>> There is no automation. Thanks! -- Andrei
>>
>> Speaking of the recent discussion of abandoned trivial PRs, here's
>> the one I submitted PR for, but got 0 attention:
>>
>> https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1675
>>
>> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16470
>
> Hmm. For me seems like you got some comments on your PR but didn't answer. Seems plausible not to include such PR.

You should check the dates ;-).
I got these comments today, only after writing this message.

On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 17:15:12 UTC, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote:
> Hmm. For me seems like you got some comments on your PR but didn't answer. Seems plausible not to include such PR.

Ah, you received those answers just now, not at that time.
Sorry.