On Friday, 31 August 2012 at 05:24:31 UTC, Tommi wrote:
>
> ...But, actually it seems that the language is a bit broken, because it doesn't follow neither one of those two options. What it actually does is this:

Obviously I don't think that the language is broken, but the compiler is. I wrote that before I had seen that the third test case (S3) results a compile-time error. At the time I wrote that I assumed it would just call .fun(*ptr3)

I filed a bug report:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8603