May 08, 2017 Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
>
Mike, given the general feedback I've received here, I think the next best take of action is to split the implicit inheritance proposal into a separate, smaller DIP, and update DIP 1004 with a second draft.
Thoughts?
| |||
Permalink
ReplyMay 09, 2017 Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Andrej Mitrovic | On Monday, 8 May 2017 at 08:25:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Thoughts?
It seems like the most sensible path forward. Mike ?
| |||
May 09, 2017 Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to deadalnix | On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 12:52:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Monday, 8 May 2017 at 08:25:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> Thoughts?
>
> It seems like the most sensible path forward. Mike ?
Works for me.
| |||
May 10, 2017 Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrej Mitrovic | On Monday, 8 May 2017 at 08:25:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
>>
>
> Mike, given the general feedback I've received here, I think the next best take of action is to split the implicit inheritance proposal into a separate, smaller DIP, and update DIP 1004 with a second draft.
>
> Thoughts?
To expand on my shorter post above: let's call this review round officially closed. I'll wait for your updates, then we'll schedule a second round for the new draft of 1004.
| |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation