Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 05, 2017 Removing stale branches | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi all, Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, Druntime and Phobos? GitHub defines a branch stale if it hasn't been updated within the last three months. The 2.06X branches are tagged anyways, so I assume they are just an relict from old times? Are there any other branches except for newCTFE, dmd-1.x, D1.0, and phobos-1.x that are necessary? Cheers, Seb DMD === https://github.com/dlang/dmd/branches/stale 2.061 2.062 2.063 2.064 2.065 2.066 revert-3761-issue13116 2.067 revert-5744-refactor_attrib MartinNowak-patch-1 revert-6217-ddmd-symlink rainers-patch-1 Druntime ======== https://github.com/dlang/druntime/branches/stale D1.0 CDGC 2.061 2.062 2.063 2.064 2.065 2.066 2.067 newCTFE Phobos ====== https://github.com/dlang/phobos/branches/stale 2.061 2.062 2.063 2.064 2.065 2.066 2.067 phobos-1.x changelog_filelogger_default_loglevel revert-3995-bigint_bounds revert-3859-getopt-checker walter_andrei_action_list faster_front revert-5087-logger-uselessfinal newCTFE |
June 05, 2017 Re: Removing stale branches | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sebastian Wilzbach | On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 19:35:58 UTC, Sebastian Wilzbach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, Druntime and Phobos?
> GitHub defines a branch stale if it hasn't been updated within the last three months.
> The 2.06X branches are tagged anyways, so I assume they are just an relict from old times?
> Are there any other branches except for newCTFE, dmd-1.x, D1.0, and phobos-1.x that are necessary?
>
> [...]
Let's keep them.
I hate change.
|
June 06, 2017 Re: Removing stale branches | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sebastian Wilzbach | On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 19:35:58 UTC, Sebastian Wilzbach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, Druntime and Phobos?
> GitHub defines a branch stale if it hasn't been updated within the last three months.
> The 2.06X branches are tagged anyways, so I assume they are just an relict from old times?
> Are there any other branches except for newCTFE, dmd-1.x, D1.0, and phobos-1.x that are necessary?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Seb
>
>
> DMD
> ===
>
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/branches/stale
>
> 2.061
> 2.062
> 2.063
> 2.064
> 2.065
> 2.066
> revert-3761-issue13116
> 2.067
> revert-5744-refactor_attrib
> MartinNowak-patch-1
> revert-6217-ddmd-symlink
> rainers-patch-1
>
> Druntime
> ========
>
> https://github.com/dlang/druntime/branches/stale
>
>
> D1.0
> CDGC
> 2.061
> 2.062
> 2.063
> 2.064
> 2.065
> 2.066
> 2.067
> newCTFE
>
> Phobos
> ======
>
> https://github.com/dlang/phobos/branches/stale
>
> 2.061
> 2.062
> 2.063
> 2.064
> 2.065
> 2.066
> 2.067
> phobos-1.x
> changelog_filelogger_default_loglevel
> revert-3995-bigint_bounds
> revert-3859-getopt-checker
> walter_andrei_action_list
> faster_front
> revert-5087-logger-uselessfinal
> newCTFE
I think a good cleanup is in order. The DMD branch of D1 have to be kept, but the one in phobos and druntime can be killed AFAIK. You can ask Luca / Mihails for confirmation.
|
June 11, 2017 Re: Removing stale branches | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sebastian Wilzbach | On 05.06.2017 21:35, Sebastian Wilzbach via Dlang-internal wrote: > DMD > === > > https://github.com/dlang/dmd/branches/stale [...] > rainers-patch-1 I've just removed this one. It was probably created when submitting a PR via the github interface: it preferred dlang instead of my personal account. |
July 21, 2017 Re: Removing stale branches | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sebastian Wilzbach | On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 19:35:58 UTC, Sebastian Wilzbach wrote:
> Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, Druntime and Phobos?
FYI, I've just cleaned up the tags a bit:
- Deleted the tag "v" from dlang.org
- Deleted the tag "vv2.059" from installer
- Deleted the tags "1.024" and "2.008" from phobos (they were redundant as the tags "phobos-1.024" and "phobos-2.008" also existed)
- Renamed the tag "phobos1-1.067" to "phobos-1.067" to correspond to the existing naming scheme.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation