As part of a cleanup of the DIP queue, DIP 1004, "Inherited Constructors", has been marked as Abandoned. This means anyone willing to take it over and move it forward, including the original author, is free to do so.

Given that this DIP was submitted under the old system and the length of time since the community review (then called "Preliminary Review"), any resurrection of this DIP would need to meet two requirements:

* revision to use the current DIP template and, where appropriate, to apply feedback from the previous review (including my summary of the previous review round)
* a new round of Community Review

It would be appropriate to retain the same DIP number unless the DIP were rewritten from scratch, in which case it would need first to enter into Draft Review.

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/other/DIP1004.md

On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 at 12:24:03 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> As part of a cleanup of the DIP queue, DIP 1004, "Inherited Constructors", has been marked as Abandoned. This means anyone willing to take it over and move it forward, including the original author, is free to do so.
>
> Given that this DIP was submitted under the old system and the length of time since the community review (then called "Preliminary Review"), any resurrection of this DIP would need to meet two requirements:
>
> * revision to use the current DIP template and, where appropriate, to apply feedback from the previous review (including my summary of the previous review round)
> * a new round of Community Review
>
> It would be appropriate to retain the same DIP number unless the DIP were rewritten from scratch, in which case it would need first to enter into Draft Review.
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/other/DIP1004.md

What a pity, so much time lost for something many considered as guaranteed to be accepted because obvious and useful. While i remembered this DIP i completely forgot that its author has left the D scene.

Plz someone, finish the work.