In response to concerns raised at the DConf AGM (and also feedback here in the forums), I've updated the documentation for the DIP process and the DIP author guidelines, and I've added guidelines for reviewers. It's all summarized in this blog post:

https://dlang.org/blog/2019/06/04/revisions-to-the-dip-process/

Anyone intending to participate in the DIP process as an author or as a reviewer is requested to become familiar with this documentation. Feedback is welcome.

I'll give this a day to settle in. Tomorrow I'll be announcing a second round of Community Review for DIP 1019, this time under the revised process.

On Tuesday, 4 June 2019 at 12:30:13 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> In response to concerns raised at the DConf AGM (and also feedback here in the forums), I've updated the documentation for the DIP process and the DIP author guidelines, and I've added guidelines for reviewers. It's all summarized in this blog post:
>
> https://dlang.org/blog/2019/06/04/revisions-to-the-dip-process/
>
> Anyone intending to participate in the DIP process as an author or as a reviewer is requested to become familiar with this documentation. Feedback is welcome.
>
> I'll give this a day to settle in. Tomorrow I'll be announcing a second round of Community Review for DIP 1019, this time under the revised process.

Thanks for your work.

In the blog post did not you rather mean the following?

> Any fundamental structural changes will need approval by Walter and Andrei.

If yes please review the penultimate sentence of the post.

On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:50:37 UTC, mate wrote:

>
> Thanks for your work.
>
> In the blog post did not you rather mean the following?
>
>> Any fundamental structural changes will need approval by Walter and Andrei.
>
> If yes please review the penultimate sentence of the post.

No, the text is correct as published. See Andrei's announcement at the beginning of the AGM:

https://youtu.be/cpTAtiboIDs?t=3041

On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:57:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:50:37 UTC, mate wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for your work.
>>
>> In the blog post did not you rather mean the following?
>>
>>> Any fundamental structural changes will need approval by Walter and Andrei.
>>
>> If yes please review the penultimate sentence of the post.
>
> No, the text is correct as published. See Andrei's announcement at the beginning of the AGM:
>
> https://youtu.be/cpTAtiboIDs?t=3041

Ok, thank you.

On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:02:29 UTC, mate wrote:
> On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:57:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

>> No, the text is correct as published. See Andrei's announcement at the beginning of the AGM:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/cpTAtiboIDs?t=3041

I've seen the AGM, but doesn't that worth a post somewhere?

/P

On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:19:07 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:02:29 UTC, mate wrote:
>> On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:57:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>
>>> No, the text is correct as published. See Andrei's announcement at the beginning of the AGM:
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/cpTAtiboIDs?t=3041
>
> I've seen the AGM, but doesn't that worth a post somewhere?
>
> /P

Yes. I'll be writing up an overview of DConf once I've finished uploading the videos.

On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 12:12:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:19:07 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
>> On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:02:29 UTC, mate wrote:
>>> On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:57:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>>
>>>> No, the text is correct as published. See Andrei's announcement at the beginning of the AGM:
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/cpTAtiboIDs?t=3041
>>
>> I've seen the AGM, but doesn't that worth a post somewhere?
>>
>> /P
>
> Yes. I'll be writing up an overview of DConf once I've finished uploading the videos.

That seems great!

Thanks, Mike!

/P