Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
yet another event loop
Aug 24, 2016
Eugene Wissner
Aug 25, 2016
mogu
Aug 25, 2016
Eugene Wissner
Aug 26, 2016
Bill Hicks
Aug 26, 2016
Eugene Wissner
Aug 26, 2016
bachmeier
Aug 26, 2016
Eugene Wissner
Aug 27, 2016
Bill Hicks
Aug 29, 2016
Johnjo Willoughby
Aug 26, 2016
Robert M. Münch
Aug 26, 2016
Eugene Wissner
Aug 26, 2016
Robert M. Münch
Aug 26, 2016
Jack Stouffer
Aug 27, 2016
Eugene Wissner
August 24, 2016
https://github.com/caraus-ecms/tanya

Ok there are not so many event loops in D and here an another one and its name is "tanya".
I want it to become not an event loop only but a general purpose library that has an event loop.

What once started as a libev rewrite, hasn't much common with libev now except some general concepts like watchers.


Regarding libev:
1) tanya is very, very basic and it hasn't a lot of important features yet like signals, UDP, threads and so on. I had to begin somewhere and stripped out everything that isn't relevant for a basic event loop. Features will be added with the time.

2) Only epoll is currently supported. But I tried to create an API that can be easily extended, so you have to extend one class and implement a few methods to add other backends.

3) In another thread chmike (many thanks again!) pointed me to Windows IOCP. I'm not completely sure I understand how the completion ports work, but I implemented the loop in the way that you haven't to care about file descriptors and sockets but get notified if the data are really available. And you write aswell not to a socket but into a buffer, and the event loop takes care of passing it then to the socket. I hope it can make the work with the loop more pleasant and can make it possible to create a performant Windows implementation.


Other points:
1) The library is 100% @nogc. I know there were some discussions that this @nogc is pure marketing thing, but I find it helpful that the compiler can say if you allocate somewhere in a language where GC allocations can happen behind the scenes.

2) The loop throws a few exceptions that should be freed, but I'm thinking to switch to some data type "either exception or return value" and make the loop nothrow. It has nothing to do with @nogc. It is just kind of not very cool if an exception can kill the event loop if something goes wrong.

3) The library isn't thread safe. I will work on it later.

4) libev wasn't the only source of inspiration. tanya is a mix of libev and asyncio and asynchronous. I took over the concept of protocols and transports from asyncio/asynchronous since I believe they make the writing of applications really pleasant. The difference is that they aren't a kind of "wrapper" around the actual event loop, but are first-class citizens. It could make it difficult to write such wrappers like that ones that exist for libasync, but on the other side it kills some unneeded abstractions and makes the code structure simplier, that could also give some additional performance.

5) I tried to write unittests and short descriptions everywhere, so there is some documentation and examples. For an usage example skip the crap I'm writing here and look at the end of this message.


There are already some "extras":
tanya.memory: has a simple allocator (Ullocator) that uses mmap/munmap (tested on Linux, will theoretically work on other platforms aswell). "allocator" package has some functions like "finalize" that can be used in @nogc code instead of dispose or "resizeArray" that is similar to shrinkArray/expandArray from std.experimental.allocator, but doesn't take a delta as argument but just the length, that the array should have. The allocator was the most difficult part of the library for me, but very interesting. I had to rewrite it 3 times till I got something working. I just advice everyone to write their own malloc/free implementaion, it is a frustrating, but awsome experience!

tanya.container: Queue, Singly-linked list and In-/Output Buffer (useful in C-style functions that take a void pointer and the length as argument and return bytes read/written). I wrote them for the event loop, not sure they are good as general-purpose containers, but I would be anyway interested to make them suitable for other use-cases. They are also differently concepted than phobos containers. Phobos containers as far as I've seen are containers that implement ranges functionality in substructs/subclasses. tanya's containers are a mix of containers and ranges.

tanya.math: has "pow" function that calculates x**y mod z. The algorithm is similar to the one used by phobos. The return type and arguments are currently ulong but it will change, I will need larger numbers probably.

tanya.random: has an "Entropy" class that can generate 64-byte blocks of random data (uses getrandom syscall). The generic logic is stolen from mbedtls.

tanya.crypto.padding: implements some algorithms to pad 128/192/258-byte blocks of data. But you cannot remove the padding :) Sorry, it will be added soon. Just started.


I made some tests with an echo-client written in Go (just found one benchmarking one-page Go echo-client in the internet). Here is an usage example, just to give some feeling how the library works (Examples and description will be added to the repository soon):

import tanya.memory;
import tanya.event.loop;
import tanya.event.protocol;
import tanya.event.transport;
import tanya.event.watcher;
import core.stdc.stdio;
import std.exception;
import core.stdc.string;
import core.sys.posix.netinet.in_;
import core.sys.posix.fcntl;
import core.sys.posix.unistd : close;

class EchoProtocol : TransmissionControlProtocol
{
@nogc:
	private DuplexTransport transport;

	void received(ubyte[] data)
	{
		transport.write(data);
		printf("%.*s", data.length, data.ptr);
	}

	void connected(DuplexTransport transport)
	{
		this.transport = transport;
		printf("Got connection.\n");
	}

	void disconnected()
	{
        printf("Disconnected.\n");
	}
}

void main()
{
	sockaddr_in addr;
	int s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
	auto loop = getDefaultLoop();

	// Echo server
	printf("Listening on port 8192\n");

	addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
	addr.sin_port = htons(cast(ushort)8192);
	addr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;

	if (bind(s, cast(sockaddr *)&addr, addr.sizeof) != 0)
	{
		throw make!Exception(defaultAllocator, "bind");
	}

	fcntl(s, F_SETFL, fcntl(s, F_GETFL, 0) | O_NONBLOCK);
	listen(s, 5);

	auto io =  make!ConnectionWatcher(defaultAllocator,
	    () => cast(Protocol) make!EchoProtocol(defaultAllocator),
	    s);

	loop.start(io);

	loop.run();

	shutdown(s, SHUT_RDWR);
	close(s);
}


Sorry for that sockaddr_in stuff, I want to add a Socket class in the next commits, that would eliminate the need of this impossible boilerplate.

So far.. I would say it is the first test release and I'm beginning with testing and continue to write. Enjoy, I hope it doesn't leak too much memory...
August 25, 2016
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 18:03:39 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
> https://github.com/caraus-ecms/tanya
>
> Ok there are not so many event loops in D and here an another one and its name is "tanya".
> ...

Nice works, thanks.


August 25, 2016
On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 00:24:59 UTC, mogu wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 18:03:39 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
>> https://github.com/caraus-ecms/tanya
>>
>> Ok there are not so many event loops in D and here an another one and its name is "tanya".
>> ...
>
> Nice works, thanks.

Hey,

Thanks for your feedback. I'm very interested if someone would like the idea and maybe participate.

It would be also nice to have some benchmarking but I couldn't find an appropriate tool for this. I found some small programs but everything in languages I don't know, so I couldn't find out if my implementation doesn't work in some cases or the benchmarking tool. Writing an own bencmarking suite would take some time that I would better spend writing the library.
Maybe I should have first a simple http server. There a lot of matured tools for testing http.
August 26, 2016
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 18:03:39 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
> https://github.com/caraus-ecms/tanya
>
> Ok there are not so many event loops in D and here an another one and its name is "tanya".
> 

Could you change the name to something more recognizable to help with D's popularity?  Something like 'kardashian' might be better.  Nobody really knows 'tanya', do you know what I mean?  Maybe even 'madonna', so people will know that D is just as talented as others languages.

Marketing is going to be key for D, so let's do our best.
August 26, 2016
On 2016-08-24 18:03:39 +0000, Eugene Wissner said:

> I want it to become not an event loop only but a general purpose library that has an event loop.

Hi, well, I would re-think this since the danger is, that everything is so connected that I can use either all or nothing at all.

I'm searching for a configurable (network, timer, GUI) stand-alone event-loop library, that abstracts away platform differences for years. Those that I found are so tighly deep coupled with the rest, that you can't get them out.

IMO general purpose libraries building their own context and world-view are waste of time...

-- 
Robert M. Münch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster

August 26, 2016
On Friday, 26 August 2016 at 02:22:54 UTC, Bill Hicks wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 18:03:39 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
>> https://github.com/caraus-ecms/tanya
>>
>> Ok there are not so many event loops in D and here an another one and its name is "tanya".
>> 
>
> Could you change the name to something more recognizable to help with D's popularity?  Something like 'kardashian' might be better.  Nobody really knows 'tanya', do you know what I mean?  Maybe even 'madonna', so people will know that D is just as talented as others languages.
>
> Marketing is going to be key for D, so let's do our best.

I think I disagree. For example I didn't know who is kardashian and the name is pretty difficult. And I think neither kardashian nor madonna are worth to name something after them. I also doubt that naming after famous people gave more popularity to kafka, picasa, ada, pascal and so on
August 26, 2016
On Friday, 26 August 2016 at 10:38:59 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
> I think I disagree. For example I didn't know who is kardashian and the name is pretty difficult. And I think neither kardashian nor madonna are worth to name something after them. I also doubt that naming after famous people gave more popularity to kafka, picasa, ada, pascal and so on

The person you responded to is a troll that has been cluttering the forum. No need to even read what they are posting.
August 26, 2016
On Friday, 26 August 2016 at 10:54:17 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> The person you responded to is a troll that has been cluttering the forum. No need to even read what they are posting.

Didn't know it, thanks
August 26, 2016
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 18:03:39 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
> https://github.com/caraus-ecms/tanya

Please make documentation easily available for your library. I wish to use event loops in D, but I have no desire to wade though someone else's code in order to figure out how use the library.
August 26, 2016
On Friday, 26 August 2016 at 10:03:22 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
> On 2016-08-24 18:03:39 +0000, Eugene Wissner said:
>
>> I want it to become not an event loop only but a general purpose library that has an event loop.
>
> Hi, well, I would re-think this since the danger is, that everything is so connected that I can use either all or nothing at all.
>
> I'm searching for a configurable (network, timer, GUI) stand-alone event-loop library, that abstracts away platform differences for years. Those that I found are so tighly deep coupled with the rest, that you can't get them out.
>
> IMO general purpose libraries building their own context and world-view are waste of time...

Do you mean that the library can have different modules but they should be independent of each other as much as possible (like phobos) or that every part that can be separated belongs to its own repository?
I absolutely agree with the first but not sure about the second point.
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2