On 8/8/2017 1:32 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 15:45:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 14:57:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731
>>
>> Thanks. I've submitted a fix.
> 
> Thanks, considering https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17569 I'd still say we should evaluate whether we want to continue maintaining and shipping a tool with unclear usefulness and userbase.

Just rename it to dmanual.

On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 20:15:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> It could use all of the runtime library functions added to the index, instead of just a smattering.

This should be the case as of a few years. Is there anything missing specifically that you can point out?

On 8/10/2017 6:03 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 20:15:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> It could use all of the runtime library functions added to the index, instead of just a smattering.
> 
> This should be the case as of a few years. Is there anything missing specifically that you can point out?
> 

No. Guess I haven't been keeping up!

On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 20:18:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/8/2017 1:32 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 15:45:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 14:57:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>>> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731
>>>
>>> Thanks. I've submitted a fix.
>> 
>> Thanks, considering https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17569 I'd still say we should evaluate whether we want to continue maintaining and shipping a tool with unclear usefulness and userbase.
>
> Just rename it to dmanual.

I've been wondering what dman was. I though it literally D Man. dmanual is the obvious name it should have.