Thread overview
Travis CI based tests based on 2.066.1 start failing
Mar 31, 2015
Baz
Mar 31, 2015
Baz
Mar 31, 2015
Mathias Lang
Mar 31, 2015
Baz
Apr 01, 2015
Mathias Lang
March 31, 2015
@MartinNowak, @klickverbot and @ibuclaw

Is is time for 2.067 ?

March 31, 2015
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 09:52:34 UTC, Baz wrote:
> @MartinNowak, @klickverbot and @ibuclaw
>
> Is is time for 2.067 ?

source:

https://github.com/kiith-sa/dmarkdown/pull/6

March 31, 2015
Importing std.algorithm.searching won't work before.
A static if (__VERSION__ >= 2067) / else would solve it.

2015-03-31 13:20 GMT+02:00 Baz via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:

> On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 09:52:34 UTC, Baz wrote:
>
>> @MartinNowak, @klickverbot and @ibuclaw
>>
>> Is is time for 2.067 ?
>>
>
> source:
>
> https://github.com/kiith-sa/dmarkdown/pull/6
>
>


March 31, 2015
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 12:31:14 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
> Importing std.algorithm.searching won't work before.
> A static if (__VERSION__ >= 2067) / else would solve it.
>
> 2015-03-31 13:20 GMT+02:00 Baz via Digitalmars-d <
> digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:
>
>> On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 09:52:34 UTC, Baz wrote:
>>
>>> @MartinNowak, @klickverbot and @ibuclaw
>>>
>>> Is is time for 2.067 ?
>>>
>>
>> source:
>>
>> https://github.com/kiith-sa/dmarkdown/pull/6

Well...do you get (understand) that I only suggest that Travis should now use 2.067 ?

April 01, 2015
2015-03-31 14:57 GMT+02:00 Baz via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:

> On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 12:31:14 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
>
>> Importing std.algorithm.searching won't work before.
>> A static if (__VERSION__ >= 2067) / else would solve it.
>>
>> 2015-03-31 13:20 GMT+02:00 Baz via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:
>>
>>  On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 09:52:34 UTC, Baz wrote:
>>>
>>>  @MartinNowak, @klickverbot and @ibuclaw
>>>>
>>>> Is is time for 2.067 ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> source:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kiith-sa/dmarkdown/pull/6
>>>
>>
> Well...do you get (understand) that I only suggest that Travis should now
> use 2.067 ?
>
>
You can use 2.067 by specifying it explicitly (there has already been
discussion on this NG).
And if you want the default to be 2.067:
https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-build/pull/418