x-post
http://forum.dlang.org/post/vbotavcclttrgvzcjjia@forum.dlang.org

On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:12:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> x-post
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/vbotavcclttrgvzcjjia@forum.dlang.org

Results:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental

tl; dr: concept approved but exact API needs work before it is
ready for std.experimental, further discussions has moved to
GitHuuntil it is ready.

Important: I have adjusted some of votes based on new inclusion
criteria defined by Andrei. If vote stated "Yes" but listed clear
API change requirements, it was counted as "No". Please have a
look at the vote list to make sure I have not interpreted
anything wrong.

On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Results:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental

Seems like my vote (http://forum.dlang.org/post/anzeespykooeiaqisfjg@forum.dlang.org) went missing – not that it would change anything, of course (later in the thread, I pointed out some other (since fixed) issues, which was the more important part). I probably should've included 1) and 2) as separate bullet points to make counting easier.

Cheers,
David

On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 20:51:48 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Results:
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental
>
> Seems like my vote (http://forum.dlang.org/post/anzeespykooeiaqisfjg@forum.dlang.org) went missing – not that it would change anything, of course (later in the thread, I pointed out some other (since fixed) issues, which was the more important part). I probably should've included 1) and 2) as separate bullet points to make counting easier.
>
> Cheers,
> David

Sorry! Unfortunately everyone keeps ignoring me asking to not start discussions in voting threads and some votes may slip through my attention :(

Updated.

On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Results:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental

The link to the team-phobos page doesn't work for me, so I'm not entirely sure what it is (list of users with commit rights?), but in any case, I don't think I'm on any such list (I don't have commit rights for Phobos).

On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 21:23:20 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Results:
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental
>
> The link to the team-phobos page doesn't work for me, so I'm not entirely sure what it is (list of users with commit rights?), but in any case, I don't think I'm on any such list (I don't have commit rights for Phobos).

There was a mail list vote recently about adding you to Phobos commiters and remembering no objections I just presumed it has already happened :O (It should have been!)