On May 29, 2012, at 03:12 AM, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote:

Fully agree, but we are within reach of 0 open regressions, so let's close that gap now and keep it there. The longer
we wait the easier it is to wait just a little more. If that's not practical for this release (and I'm not accepting
that premise), can we commit NOW that the next release will be at 0 open regression bugs as a release criteria?

I agree. We really don't have an official road map or release schedule so I don't see any problem with waiting with the release until the regressions are fixed.