The branches need to be cleaned up to make this release anyway. I don't see how calling it 2.066 would make doing this any easier.

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote:

On 1/12/2014 9:48 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:

I am strongly against skipping 2.065.

Why?

Just fix it and release it.

It's a lot more work than to do a 2.066, which means it needs justification.

_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta