Could you give a code example of what you mean?  You can still use multiple catch blocks perfectly well with this patch.
"Kevin Cox" <kevincox.ca@gmail.com> wrote in message news:mailman.97.1330172953.24984.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com...

I think there should also be multiple catches so that you can deal with different exceptions different ways without trying to upcast them over and over again.

On Feb 25, 2012 1:30 AM, "Daniel Murphy" <yebblies@nospamgmail.com> wrote:
"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.93.1330149312.24984.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com...
> However, regardless of which we choose, someone is going to have to take
> the
> time to implement it, since odds are that Walter isn't going to do it. So,
> whether we end up with a feature along these lines is highly dependent on
> whether anyone is willing to take the time to implement it and get it
> accepted
> by Walter.

Waaaay ahead of you here.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/738

It's currently 'catch(auto e : E1, E2, E3)' but changing the syntax is
trivial if everyone decides they want it.