>I'd like to see proper DLL (shared library) support and DIP45 implemented. I'm making a project that I hope in the future will be extendable with D plugins.


Out of curiousity, what's wrong with the current dll support?

2017-12-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 angel via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:
Built-in tuples:

{val1, val2} = func();


On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 07:53:51 UTC, IM wrote:
I will start:

   -- Better compiler errors, better compiler errors, better compiler errors.


I really wish that the compiler errors could receive some refinement. Mostly it feels like some error text just being thrown at me. It needs to be better formatted, more helpful, with suggestions about how to fix (if possible).

To illustrate my point:

- See the compile errors I've just encountered with DMD: https://cdn.pbrd.co/images/H0q609l.png

- Now compare that with an error produced by rustc:
https://cdn.pbrd.co/images/H0q6bLi.png


Simple things like these make a big difference. D Lang has been around for a long while now, and hence signs of its maturity has to show everywhere, especially in the compiler, as well as the package manager.