On 9/11/07, Nicolai Waniek <nospam@inval.id> wrote:
Apart from that it would cover your problem
with "internal RW-access, external R-access only".

I think you may have missed the point there. We can already do that with D. I /have/ no problem with "internal RW-access, external R-access only". There is no problem to solve. Nonetheless, it would still be cool if there were a new keyword or some other way to mean:

 privately_readwrite_but_publicly_readonly int x;

See?

I already know how to do it without the "privately_readwrite_but_publicly_readonly" keyword.