On Apr 10, 2012 7:08 PM, "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> > I'm planning to go over druntime and add nothrow/pure everywhere I
> > can, but I don't want to disturb anyone else who's currently working
> > on patches that this could disrupt.
> [...]
>
> Please do. The current lack of proper function qualifiers has been
> bugging me to no end, every time I try to do the same in my own code. I
> inevitably have to remove some qualifiers that should be there, just
> because of a single druntime construct that wasn't properly qualified.
>
> And while you're at it, you might want to consider const too. Last I
> looked, a whole bunch of stuff that should be const, isn't.
>
> And best of luck to you... the last time I tried to do the same thing I
> ended up changing almost the entire druntime, and still couldn't get the
> result to compile.
>
>
> T
>
> --
> "I speak better English than this villain Bush" -- Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, Iraqi Minister of Information

I was wondering why they could not be implied from the code itself.