I actually quite liked Tristan's argument.

[attr, attr2] feels more like what it is, an annotation. It does nothing, has no effect on the declaration on its own.
the @attr syntax looks like existing attributes, and with that kinda comes the presumption that they actually DO something, affect the code generated in some way.
For that reason, I buy the argument that [attrs...] being visually distinct makes more sense, more like what it is.

Perhaps it should be termed 'annotation' rather than 'attribute'?


On 6 November 2012 21:38, ponce <spam@spam.org> wrote:
I like @(ArgumentList) better for stated reason: it looks like
existing @attributes.