On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr@gmx.ch> wrote:
On 06/27/2012 12:49 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Tobias Pankrath <tobias@pankrath.net
<mailto:tobias@pankrath.net>> wrote:

   On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 at 10:34:53 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:

       I find myself wanting this over and over again. Reading the docs for
       Orange made me realize, that I'm not alone.


   http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/__wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/__DIP16

   <http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP16>


Wonderful. Is there a vote for it? And what about the private module idea?

--
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.

private module does not make sense, because private means 'only
accessible to this module'. What you want is a package module.

Yes, I thought of naming it a package module, but it semantically conflicts with the module, which represents the entire package (as described in the first issue).

--
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.