On 16/11/12 05:15, Rob T wrote:One of the oldest open enhancement requests is on this topic:
On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 03:41:45 UTC, Stugol wrote:
Event_t e2; // Will compile!
Yeah but that kinda blows, doesn't it?
I found it surprising or unintuitive that the !() is required, and I do
want to know what is the reasoning behind it,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1012
I don't what the reason is. It'd be interesting to revive the patch there, and see if it passes the compiler test suite.