On Wednesday, 27 September 2017 at 04:59:10 UTC, Manu wrote:

On 26 September 2017 at 21:41, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 17:11:56 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:

Should we add `a * b` to ndslice for 1d vectors?
Discussion at https://github.com/libmir/mir-algorithm/issues/91

I'd say yes.

Atila

Just remember, it's okay to vote no! Even if it makes you a bigoted dick ;)
In this case, I think 'no' is the only reasonable choice.
If this is going to seriously be considered, then ndslice should definitely
be renamed to 'matrix'.

An alternative solution might be to introduce a wrapper of ndslice called 'matrix' that supports matrix mul...?

I would prefer outer operator overloading be added to D instead of type wrappers. So a user can import a library for operations, rather then library of wrappers. --Ilya