On 22 December 2012 19:32, Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com> wrote:
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 00:42:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/13/2012 4:17 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
1. How much work would it be for the guys at Remedy Games to convert their
codebase from [] to @()?

I don't know. All I know is it's a lot of code.

You should ask. It's really crazy to ask the WHOLE community to take the bullet for some company using an experimental unreleased version of the compiler without even knowing if there is a good reason why they can't just fix their code.

And in any case, this is theirs problem, they should be using a special version of the compiler (the one that accepts broken code), not all the rest!

This is just completely crazy...


This.


--
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';