On 14 January 2012 00:31, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:
On 1/13/12 2:41 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/13/2012 12:27 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 13/01/12 8:02 PM, Mehrdad wrote:
Er... is there any reason why we're using such a cryptic PXOR value
instead of operator overloading?
I imagine Walter will add the operator overloads later.
Right. simd() is just the bottom layer building block. It's a compiler
intrinsic, and I don't want to make every overload a compiler intrinsic.
...I really don't think they will.
and most people would never dive this deep if the standard lib does its job properly.