On Wed, 22 May 2013 10:06:46 -0700
Timothee Cour <
thelastmammoth@gmail.com> wrote:
> it's only module level granularity.
>
> I agree that a library solution is the way to go, however there needs
> to be a way to have finer granularity, ie being able to call
> individual unittests. I gave the reasons in the 2nd post in this
> thread. Syntax would be: unittest(test_fun){...}
> having a short syntax such as this will make people use it.
>
> digressing, I wish there would be a simple non-anonymous way to vote
> for such features, to see whether most people agree/disagree. It's
> easier than voting by email, which invariably gets lost in
> digressions (as I'm doing here).
>