I'd say this is a good thing. Please don't pollute the source tree with junk placed next to the source files. This is very un-visual-studio. They should be in the intermediate folder next to the obj files.
On 01.06.2013 16:59, Flamaros wrote:
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 10:55:36 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 01.06.2013 12:45, Flamaros wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 22:39:28 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
I followed indications, lst files are correctly generated for the code
coverage, but I don't have the coloration in the editor. Can be because
my application crash when exiting?
If your application crashed, the lst file might be from a previous run
and is considered out of sync. Please check whether it is newer than
the source file.
Also, it has to be in the same folder with the same base name as the
source. I've recently noticed that the lst files generation seem to
replace '/' with '-' in path names making it pretty unpredictable were
to look for files when all you know the source file name. I'll have to
add a workaround for that.
When I check last modification of lst files it seems good.
Effectively files name contains '-' characters (ex :
"..-src-dquick-item-mouseAreaItem.lst")
Source file naming prevent '-' characters, so if everybody follow this
rule replacing '-' by '/' will allow you to get right paths.
I guess Visual D will have to remember the last directory where it invoked the "Compile and Run" command and try to match lst files in that directory to the current source file.
Does anybody know why the lst file is not written side-by-side with the source file?