Next, we're gonna have to update the libs. What does it take to update the libs? Are there any legal or technical difficulties?

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:

On Saturday, May 12, 2012 22:28:12 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> There is a very good binding of WinAPI in dsource.org in bindings project.
> It's aim is to precisely replicate the WinAPI's headers.
> What are the requirements of the druntime WinAPI? What needs to be done to
> get the existing binding into druntime?

What kind of requirements are you worried about? We want all of the Win32 API
bindings in druntime in an organized manner (my first guess would be according
to the dll or header that they come from in C, but I don't know how the
bindings project does it or necessarily what the best way is). I don't believe
that what's currently in druntime is necessarily organized properly (I don't
think that where new declarations go has been all that organized), so some
stuff will likely have to be moved around when the WinAPI bindings are merged
in (with the appropriate deprecation path used for any declarations that must
be moved). But really, it's just a question of someone taking the time and
making the effort to merge the WinAPI bindings into druntime and creating a
pull request for it.

- Jonathan M Davis

--
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.