I agree. That way it will become more apparent what really needs to be written for D. Currently there &quot;appears&quot; to be a lot of stuff written for D, when there&#39;s not more, then just a few.<div>Also, I think there should be a strict division of D1 and D2 projects (where projects, supporting both would appear in both categories).</div>
<div>For instance, there&#39;s the DDL library for custom dynamic libraries in D, but it&#39; D1 only, making it completely useless for the vast majority of D programmers.</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Dmitry Olshansky <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:dmitry.olsh@gmail.com" target="_blank">dmitry.olsh@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 15.05.2012 14:04, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
Derelict 3 is under development and is on github, so Derelict is not<br></div>
gonna be on <a href="http://dsource.org" target="_blank">dsource.org</a> &lt;<a href="http://dsource.org" target="_blank">http://dsource.org</a>&gt; for too long,<br>
A plethora of dead projects on <a href="http://dsource.org" target="_blank">dsource.org</a> &lt;<a href="http://dsource.org" target="_blank">http://dsource.org</a>&gt; is a<div class="im"><br>
good way to scare away newcomers, i think.<br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
I think that a global purge can save it. Just archive/move away all of projects not updated for more then 1 year into some sort of Archive section. In case of misfire author can just contact admin and get his project reinstated.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>

<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Dmitry Olshansky<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Bye,<br>Gor Gyolchanyan.<br>
</div>