On 6/4/13 4:36 AM, Manu wrote:
[snip]

I've read this, thanks for answering. Unfortunately I need to retire from this thread - there's only so many hours in the day, and it seems we got to the point where all sides shout the same malarkey over and over again past one another.

It would be great if this thread results in a language improvement - a means to negate a storage class label inside a class.