On Saturday, June 22, 2019 2:52:33 PM MDT Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 22.06.19 22:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > As long as @safe code doesn't actually benefit from the implicit
> > conversion to scope shared, it makes no sense to me to have it happen.
> > The entire point is for it to be used with @trusted stuff. And if
> > that's the case, then why not just have the cast be explicit and
> > @trusted like it normally would be?
> Why would @safe code not benefit? Manu's use case is @safe code calling
> into a @trusted library.

Because if all of the code is @safe, then the fact that it was converted to
scope shared gains you nothing. It's not really shared across threads, and
it doesn't enable any useful operations.