February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | You're right indeed, but this is a different issue. If you need to perform... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | <minor-rant> On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 10:13 +0100, Don wrote: Sounds like... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | Me too. A word is two bytes. Any other definition seems to be pretty useless... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | I agree that size_t/ptrdiff_t are misnomers and I'd love to kill... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 06:49:26 +0300, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin@michelf.com... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | Tell that Intel guys, their assembler syntax (read most x86 assemblers) uses size prefixes word... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | That's just a legacy issue from when windows was mainly on 16-bit machines... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | It was not proposed to alter ulong (int64), but to only a size_t equivalent... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | If you write low level code, it happens all the time. For example, you can... | ||
February 17, 2011 General » Re: Integer conversions too pedantic in 64-bit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | This whole conversation makes me feel like The Naive Noob for complaining about how much... | ||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation