4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16301] CTFE execution of opApply keeps wrong "this" context in foreach's body | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16300] Add pragma(section, "section-name") to place data/functions in a particular section | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16297] Immutable data with statically-known initializer should be implicitly "static" | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16265] unittest imports should not be counted as dependencies for static ctors | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16242] Sometimes dependencies are not properly stored/detected | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16239] is(typeof(foo)) hides deprecation message about foo | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16235] type of conditional expression (ternary operator) is widened when operands differ in constness | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16224] -cov marks the last line of do/while(0); as uncovered | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16222] empty array literal should have type noreturn[] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
4 days ago Issues » [Issue 16220] User-defined synchronized implementation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| ...NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | ||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation