...would make it so that there would be one more thing that the programmer would...

...writeln("...");
            }
        }
    }
}
```
And I was wondering if it would be worthwhile to convert it to functional...

...be rather surprising and I think it would sometimes lead to undefined behavior with current...

...opt AggregateBody
+   "__commaExpr" '(' CommaExpression ')'
```

This would not break code, nor would it affect tuples. No...

...use a format
string?
Seems like it would make more sense with a different name...

...a body, that the .di generator sees?

Okay sure, that would be a good addition.

...run with `dub run redub`. Though I would recommend building it and adding to PATH...

...and this would do the exact opposite of that.

So, IMHO, this would be adding...

...float;
@F int i;
```

but not

```d
@float int i;
```

which proposal #2 would address.

...uninitialized). Using a void[] instead of a typed lvalue would be consistent with that approach.