Index » D » 'new' syntax (page 2)

March 31, 2003
"factory" <tehdasX@optushome.com.au> wrote in message news:MPG.18eaac936b6e48b98968a@news.digitalmars.com...
>   And one does not have to demand that a shorter form of the syntax has
> to be used..
>
>   A x; // x is uninitialized
>   A x1(); // x1 is one instance of A
>   A x2= new B; // x2 is one instance of B

The problem with the A x1(); syntax is it is syntactically ambiguous with a
function declaration.


Next ›   Last »
1 2
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home