View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
April 20, 2005
unittest for nested functions?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner
functions can be tested? 

# void outer(){
# 	static int inner(){
#		return 0;
#	} 
#
#	unittest{
#		assert(inner()==0);
#	}
# }

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCZe4h3w+/yD4P9tIRAsZiAKCqXhIB4zSoe5ctT4ALasyXGOZWbwCgqgyP
2FoEwP8wvVW7+OmDwJLUXP0=
=Tgr9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
April 21, 2005
Re: unittest for nested functions?
Hmmm... Won't this work?...

unittest
{
 function.test();
 assert(foo);
 //etc.
}

TZ


"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop@kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1@lnews.kuehne.cn...
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner
> functions can be tested?
>
> # void outer(){
> # static int inner(){
> # return 0;
> # }
> #
> # unittest{
> # assert(inner()==0);
> # }
> # }
>
> Thomas
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iD8DBQFCZe4h3w+/yD4P9tIRAsZiAKCqXhIB4zSoe5ctT4ALasyXGOZWbwCgqgyP
> 2FoEwP8wvVW7+OmDwJLUXP0=
> =Tgr9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
April 21, 2005
Re: unittest for nested functions?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

TechnoZeus schrieb am Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:18 -0500:
> Hmmm... Won't this work?...
>
> unittest
> {
>   function.test();
>   assert(foo);
>   //etc.
> }
>
> TZ
>
>
> "Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop@kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1@lnews.kuehne.cn...
>>
>> Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner
>> functions can be tested?
>>
>> # void outer(){
>> # static int inner(){
>> # return 0;
>> # }
>> #
>> # unittest{
>> # assert(inner()==0);
>> # }
>> # }
>>
>> Thomas

Nice catch. 
BTW where is this documented?

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCZzUH3w+/yD4P9tIRAmtJAKDLEsvU5Kn6H+lE5ieti12ayULyOgCfVizx
HVz4XAbnmB91AIwBYQGhmwY=
=v0i6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
April 21, 2005
Re: unittest for nested functions?
Don't know if it is documented.  It just seemed to make sense.

TZ

"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop@kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:71pjj2-b54.ln1@lnews.kuehne.cn...
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> TechnoZeus schrieb am Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:18 -0500:
> > Hmmm... Won't this work?...
> >
> > unittest
> > {
> >   function.test();
> >   assert(foo);
> >   //etc.
> > }
> >
> > TZ
> >
> >
> > "Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop@kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1@lnews.kuehne.cn...
> >>
> >> Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner
> >> functions can be tested?
> >>
> >> # void outer(){
> >> # static int inner(){
> >> # return 0;
> >> # }
> >> #
> >> # unittest{
> >> # assert(inner()==0);
> >> # }
> >> # }
> >>
> >> Thomas
>
> Nice catch.
> BTW where is this documented?
>
> Thomas
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iD8DBQFCZzUH3w+/yD4P9tIRAmtJAKDLEsvU5Kn6H+lE5ieti12ayULyOgCfVizx
> HVz4XAbnmB91AIwBYQGhmwY=
> =v0i6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home