May 07, 2008Re: terrible executable size if with dsss -full buildflags
Posted in reply to Frank Benoit
On Tue, 06 May 2008 21:55:02 +0200 Frank Benoit <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > I don't know exactly why the old dwt is significant smaller in code > size. Perhaps this is because Shawn combined many Java classes into > modules. I decided not to do this, instead I want to stay as close as > possible to the Java sources. So later merges are easier. > > Another issue is, to have dynamic libs available. Afaik, at the moment > DMD doesn't support dynamic libs for classes/exceptions/GC on win32 nor > linux. On win32 DDL might be an option. But i don't know if libs would > solve your problem with the executable size. > > So my main toolchain issues at the moment are: > - compile speed > - executable size > - dynamic lib supprt (D<->D with classes/interfaces/exceptions/...) > - distribution system with easy install and dependency management > - better debugging support and stacktrace information at runtime > > Frank > Tickets for these issues: http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt/ticket/3 http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt/ticket/4 -- yidabu <email@example.com> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwin D 语言-中文(D Chinese): http://www.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://bbs.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://dwin.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://scite4d.d-programming-language-china.org/
May 18, 2008Re: terrible executable size if with dsss -full buildflags
Posted in reply to yidabu
Relive Shawn's DWT and keep it size.