dmd 1.062 and 2.047 beta (page 5)

Most likely it is.

I updated the code for stdio for windows, but I didn't have a setup on a windows box to test with.  (yay at least it compiles!)

I'll try getting my windows box up to snuff and try to fix this.

-Steve

----- Original Message ----
> From: Don Clugston <dclugston at googlemail.com>
> To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
> Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 10:22:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [dmd-beta] dmd 1.062 and 2.047 beta
> 
> std.stdio is failing unit tests on Windows. Behaves the same way with 2.048,  so it's a Phobos issue, not a compiler bug. Maybe another appender  issue?
> --------------------
> unittest
> core.exception.AssertError at std.stdio(549):  unittest failure
> object.Exception at std\file.d(1429): Trailing characters at  the end of line: `
> 
>                                      '
> --------------------
> 
> On 27 August 2010 15:39, Steve Schveighoffer  <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I  realized that I broke this right away and fixed it, but I forgot to check
>in.
> > Try again now:
> >
> >  http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1934
> >
> >  -Steve
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From:  Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario at gmx.de>
> >>
> >>  Hi Andrei,
> >>
> >> I think Walter has just committed a fix for  this. See
> >>  http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4302
> >>
> >> I  could not verify  it yet, because the current dmd/phobos combination
> >>  causes an error for  me
> >>
> >> std\xml.d(373): Error: cannot  implicitly convert expression
> >> (result.data()) of type string to  char[]
> >> std\xml.d(1148): Error: template  instance  std.xml.encode!(char[]) error
> >> instantiating
> >>
> >>  This seems to  have to crept in with the recent Appender  changes.
> >>
> >> Rainer
> >>
> >> Andrei   Alexandrescu wrote:
> >> > Hello Rainer,
> >> >
> >>  > Catching up with my  email backlog. Was there a fix on this  issue?
> >> >
> >> >  Andrei
> >> >
> >>  > On 6/11/10 11:30 PDT, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> >> >>   Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I've tried to untangle the  startsWith code, and  here's the minimal
test
> >> >> case I could  come up with so  far:
> >> >>
> >> >>  ///////////////////////
> >> >> template  binaryFunImpl(bool  b)
> >> >> {
> >> >> template Body()
> >>  >>  {
> >> >> static assert(b);
> >> >> alias  bool BodyType;
> >> >>  }
> >> >> alias  Body!().BodyType ReturnType; // line 9
> >> >>  }
> >>  >>
> >> >> uint startsWith(A)(A a) if (is(binaryFunImpl!(true   ).ReturnType)) {
> >> >> return 1; }
> >> >> uint  startsWith(A)(A a) if  (is(binaryFunImpl!(false).ReturnType)) {
> >>  >> return 0; } // line  13
> >> >>
> >> >> const  uint var = startsWith(1);
> >> >>   ///////////////////////
> >> >> dmd produces:
> >>  >>
> >> >>  test.d(6): Error: static assert (b) is  false
> >> >> test.d(9): instantiated  from here:  Body!()
> >> >> test.d(13): instantiated from here:   binaryFunImpl!(false)
> >> >>
> >> >> The error does  not show up if var  is not const. Also, dmd 2.032 to
>2.045
> >> >>  do not produce this error  (2.046 fails), so it must be some  compiler
> >> >>  regression.
> >> >>
> >>  >> As it seems, the compile time evaluation of  startsWith uses the  wrong
> >> >> specialization. Maybe, it is just not  gagging error  output?
> >> >>
> >> >> Any other ideas? I have not  yet  dived too deep into the template code
>of
> >> >> the compiler,  but if nobody  has a better clue (and time), I can give
it
> >> >>  a  try.
> >> >>
> >> >> Rainer
> >>  >>
> >> >> Andrei Alexandrescu  wrote:
> >>  >>> Thanks. It may take a while before I can tend to this.  Could  someone
> >> >>> else look at it?
> >>  >>>
> >> >>>  Andrei
> >>  >>>
> >> >>> On 06/10/2010 12:53 PM, Rainer Schuetze   wrote:
> >> >>>> Sorry, but it still doesn't work. The error  occurs  when the
>expression
> >> >>>> is evaluated at compile  time, so the  code added to the unittest
> >> >>>> does  not
> >> >>>>  cover the issue.
> >>  >>>>
> >> >>>>  Rainer
> >>  >>>>
> >> >>>> Andrei Alexandrescu   wrote:
> >> >>>>> Apologies. svn up should fix it, and  bring some  more goodies too
>:o).
> >> >>>>>
> >>  >>>>>  Andrei
> >> >>>>>
> >>  >>>>> On 06/10/2010 10:14 AM,  Don Clugston wrote:
> >>  >>>>>> const bool fails =  startsWith("ab", "a");
> >>  >>>>>   _______________________________________________
> >>  >>>>> dmd-beta  mailing list
> >> >>>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> >>  >>>>>  http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> >>  >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ;  _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>  dmd-beta  mailing list
> >> >>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> >>  >>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> >>  >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>   _______________________________________________
> >> >> dmd-beta  mailing  list
> >> >> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> >>  >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> >> >   _______________________________________________
> >> > dmd-beta  mailing  list
> >> > dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> >> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> >>  >
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >> dmd-beta  mailing  list
> >> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > dmd-beta mailing  list
> > dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta  mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> 

Forums